Women's Wear Daily thinks that anorexic models may be covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act. "Under the protections of the act," WWD said, "a candidate cannot be passed over for a job only because he or she has a disability, if an employer could accommodate the person with a reasonable amount of adjustments."
It's amazing how desperate the fashion industry is to find some way to accommodate its preference for size 0 models. First, they argue that it's not the designers' fault, it's the stylists, or the models, or maybe the modeling agencies. When that argument fails, Vogue steps up with a panel of fashion insiders discussing eating disorders and the CFDA offers voluntary guidelines. And then WWD raises the specter of the ADA to an industry that has never given much thought to addressing the rights of minorities or the disabled.
When I see a model rolling down the runway in a wheelchair at the next Calvin Klein show, maybe I'll feel for the designers who worry about the legality of excluding anorexics.

Thank you for sharing!
Posted by: beijing opera show | December 22, 2011 at 12:12 PM
The industry is clearly balking at having any external guidelines that limit the pool of talent from which they can discriminate.
Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | June 01, 2011 at 04:55 AM
Good post is like good cooking;it can be tasted,but not explained.
Posted by: ugg boots outlet | November 12, 2010 at 02:42 AM
Charm is a sort of bloom on a woman. If you have it, you don’t need to have
anything else; and if you don’t have it, it doesn’t much matter what else you have.
Posted by: chanel bas | November 09, 2010 at 04:07 AM
A great man is always willing to be little.
Posted by: new jordans | November 05, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Every body knows that life seems to be expensive, but different people require cash for different issues and not every one earns enough cash. Hence to get good personal loans or short term loan would be good solution.
Posted by: Foley25Tommie | October 11, 2010 at 04:26 AM
We got out carrying bags of hope! With it we will fight harder!
Posted by: Nike Dunks | August 17, 2010 at 08:30 PM
Four short words sum up what has lifted most successful individuals above the crowd: a little bit more.
Posted by: jordan retro 4 | July 05, 2010 at 03:41 AM
Four short words sum up what has lifted most successful individuals above the crowd: a little bit more.
Posted by: jordan retro 4 | July 05, 2010 at 03:12 AM
This is bull. Yes anorexia is a disease, but designers and modeling agencies should't be risking the lives of girls to sell clothes. One of the biggest debates is about the marketing strategies to sell to buyers, but as a designer and a business woman, I feel that if people feel the need for their models to have the waist size 0--the size of an 8 year old--they should be using and 8 year old. There is nothing wrong with showing curves at all. If you look at what modeling agencies call their plus size models size 6 (US) and up, you realize that they are calling most women around the world FAT. I don't think agencies have the right to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to justify why they are risking lives to sell clothing. And to the people who reject everyone who is not size 0 or the like, that could be called discrimination, which is illegal. As a designer I will NEVER use a model who has a BMI of less than 18.5 which is anorexic. However, most models used on runways are below a BMI of 16 which is the BMI of someone who has starvation and is on the brink of death.
Posted by: Codi | April 24, 2010 at 04:41 PM
Cunningham was in part inspired by Apple's HyperCard. Apple had designed a system allowing users to create virtual "card stacks" supporting links among the various cards. Cunningham developed Vannevar Bush's ideas by allowing users to "comment on and change one another's text
Posted by: Generic Viagra | April 15, 2010 at 10:25 AM
You seem to have got the niche from the root, Awesome work
Posted by: pass a drug test | November 06, 2009 at 05:53 AM
If people would see what was under the clothing they modeled, maybe people would not find them as attractive
Posted by: Kari-Ann Muravsky | September 26, 2007 at 09:54 AM
The folks who cast fashion shows and shoots employ all sorts of crazy -- and probably illegal -- reasons to exclude/include a given model. Too tall. Too short. Too young. Too old. Too curvy. Not sexy enough. Whatever. The industry is clearly balking at having any external guidelines that limit the pool of talent from which they can discriminate.
Posted by: Jane | May 06, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Right on! I don't think that anorexia can possibly be conceived of as a disability. The legal definition is:
“The term ‘disability’ means, with respect to an individual –
(a) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual;
(b) a record of such impairment; or
(c) being regarded as having such an impairment.” (P.L. 101-336, Sec. )
The ADA definition is an inclusive definition that tends to capture both the largest and broadest estimate of people with disabilities. It describes a disability as a condition which limits a person’s ability to function in major life activities – including communication, walking, and self-care (such as feeding and dressing oneself) – and which is likely to continue indefinitely, resulting in the need for supportive services.
There's more at the site where I got this,
including the major categories of disability, including mobility impairment, cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, visual impairment, and speech impairment. It's damned hard to be classified as disabled by state and federal agencies.
Email me if you want the URL.
Posted by: Kiwi | May 05, 2007 at 06:58 PM